Show simple item record

Fatigue crack propagation behaviour of carboxyl-terminated polybutadiene solid rocket propellants

dc.contributor.authorLópez, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorSalazar, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Jesús
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T09:48:26Z
dc.date.available2024-01-30T09:48:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-10
dc.identifier.citationLópez, R., Salazar, A. & Rodríguez, J. "Fatigue crack propagation behaviour of carboxyl-terminated polybutadiene solid rocket propellants". Int J Fract 223, 3–15 (2020). 10.1007/s10704-020-00435-5es
dc.identifier.issn0376-9429
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10115/29197
dc.descriptionAuthors are indebted to Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain for their financial support through project DPI2016-80389-C2-1-R.es
dc.description.abstractThe fatigue crack growth behavior of composite solid carboxyl-terminated polybutadiene (CTPB) base propellants from a two stage-rocket has been analyzed. Both motors presented similar compositional percentage of the different constituents but while the booster motor presented aluminum as fuel and fine oxidizer particles, the sustainer motor presented nitroguanidine as fuel and coarse rigid inorganic particles. The fracture characterization revealed that the critical energy release rate values obtained from the grains of the booster motor were higher than those computed from the sustainer motor. The fatigue crack growth behavior of the propellant grains under study was comparable to that shown in rubber and the fatigue crack growth curves obtained from the booster motor were below those from the sustainer motor. The micromechanism of failure in both motors was microvoid nucleation and growth till the formation of a macro-crack capable of subcritical advancement. In the grains from the booster motor, the nucleation and progression of damage occurred through the matrix with fracture surfaces plain and with no trace of oxidizer particles. Instead, in the propellant grains from the sustainer motor, the damagewas generated in the particle–binder interface and the progression occurred along these interfaces leading to an abrupt fracture surface with discernible oxidizer particles. The mechanism of failure in the booster motor led to a better fatigue crack growth behavior and the irregular crack advancement in the sustainer motor implied a lower exponent of the crack growth rate to the energy release rate power law.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherSpringer Linkes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectFatigue crack growth behaviores
dc.subjectFracture behavioures
dc.subjectTensile behavioures
dc.subjectCTPB solid propellantses
dc.titleFatigue crack propagation behaviour of carboxyl-terminated polybutadiene solid rocket propellantses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10704-020-00435-5es
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional