Bagus, PhilippDaumann, FrankFollert, Florian2024-02-282024-02-282023Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility. Microaggressions, cancel culture, safe spaces, and academic freedom: A private property rights argumentation Philipp Bagus, Frank Daumann, Florian Follert First published: 09 November 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12626https://hdl.handle.net/10115/30716Science is critical and thrives on discourse. However, new challenges for science and academic freedom have arisen from an often-discussed cancel culture and an increas-ing demand for safe spaces, which are justified by their assumed protection against microaggressions. These phenomena can impede scientific progress and innovation by prohibiting certain thought processes and heterodox ideas that eventually result in new ideas, publications, statements, etc. In this paper, we use the approach of prop-erty rights ethics to shed light on these phenomena, especially in academia. First, we argue that microaggressions must be generally tolerated according to property rights ethics as the starting point for discussion. Then, we analyze cancel culture and safe spaces in academia. To this end, we distinguish between two basic cases in the educational system. We show that cancel culture and safe spaces seem justifiable in a private education system but have no place in public, tax-funded universities from the perspective of property ethics. Our essay contributes, on the one hand, to the economic analysis of science and, on the other hand, to the ethical study of new phe-nomena in modern societies.Atribución 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/academiaacademic freedomcancel cultureethicsfree speechlibertarianismmicroaggressionsproperty rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10.1111/beer.12626info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess