Armannsdottir, Anna L.Beckerle, PhilippMoreno, Juan C.van Asseldonk, Edwin H. F.Manrique-sancho, María Teresadel-Ama, Antonio J.Veneman, Jan F.Briem, Kristin2024-01-042024-01-042020-01-13Ármannsdóttir AL, Beckerle P, Moreno JC, van Asseldonk EHF, Manrique-Sancho MT, Del-Ama AJ, Veneman JF, Briem K. Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons: A Survey Study. Hum Factors. 2020 May;62(3):351-3640018-7208https://hdl.handle.net/10115/28159Publicación realizada en el seno de la COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) Action CA16116: Wearable Robots for Augmentation, Assistance or Substitution of Human Motor Func-tions de la que formé parte como investigador. Colaboración con instituciones de: Alemania, Islandia, Paises Bajos, España y Suiza. CONTRIBUCIÓN (según taxonomía CReDIT): Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writting: original draft, Writting: review & editing -------------------------------------- Indicios de calidad: - A nivel del medio de difusión Revista con revisión por pares doble ciego indexada en JCR, en el primer cuartil (Q1) y primer tercil (T1) en las categorías de Ingeniería industrial (JCR) y Human Factors and Ergonomics (Scopus), con factor de impacto 2.888 en el año de publicación del artículo (2020) - A nivel de aportación. El artículo ha tenido una acogida excelente en la comunidad científica que trabaja en el ámbito de la robótica par la rehabilitación, probablemente debido al factor amplificador resultante de la red COST. Tiene 54 citas (WoS), situándose en el percentil 94 (Scopus) de los artículos de temática similar. Este impacto también se ve reflejado en los índices normalizados normalizados de citas (3.13 (FWCI, Scoups) y 3.18 (FCR, Dimensions)). Estas cifras también son consistentes con las métricas de uso y acceso a través de las principales redes de interacción científica: Mendeley (106 accesos) y ResearchGate (353 accesos).Objective: To explore user-centered design methods currently implemented during development of lower limb wearable robots and how they are utilized during different stages of product development. Background: Currently, there appears to be a lack of standardized frameworks for evaluation methods and design requirements to implement effective user-centered design for safe and effective clinical or ergonomic system application. Method: Responses from a total of 191 experts working in the field of lower limb exoskeletons were analyzed in this exploratory survey. Descriptive statistics were used to present responses and measures of frequency, and chi-square tests were used to contrast the answers of respondents who identified as clinicians versus engineers. Results: A vast majority of respondents involve users in their development, in particular at the initial and iterative stages, although some differences were found between disciplines. A variety of methods and metrics are used to capture feedback from users and test devices, and although valuable, some methods used may not be based on validated measures. Guidelines regarding tests on safety of exoskeletons also lack standardization. Conclusion: There seems to be a consensus among experts regarding the importance of a user-centered approach in exoskeleton development; however, standardized frameworks with regard to appropriate testing methods and design approaches are lacking. Such frameworks should consider an interdisciplinary focus on the needs and safety of the intended user during each iteration of the process. Application: This exploratory study provides an overview of current practice among engineers and clinicians regarding the user-centered design of exoskeletons. Limitations and recommendations for future directions are identified.engAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/wearable robotsoutcome measuresUsability testing and evaluationuser-centered design strategiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10.1177/0018720819883info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess