Examinando por Autor "Salom-Moreno, J"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Manual Physical Therapy Versus Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Evidence From a Randomized Clinical Trial
(Alexandria, VA, 2019) Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C; Ortega-Santiago, R; Fahandezh-Saddi Díaz, H; Salom-Moreno, J; Cleland, JA; Pareja, JA; Arias-Buría, José L
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) results in substantial societal costs and can be treated either by nonsurgical or surgical approaches. Objective: To evaluate differences in cost-effectiveness of manual physical therapy versus surgery in women with CTS. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 120 women with a clinical and an electromyographic diagnosis of CTS were randomized through concealed allocation to either manual physical therapy or surgery. Interventions consisted of 3 sessions of manual physical therapy, including desensitization maneuvers of the central nervous system, or decompression/release of the carpal tunnel. Societal costs and health-related quality of life (estimated by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D] scale) over 1 year were used to generate incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year ratios for each treatment. Results: The analysis was possible for 118 patients (98%). Incremental quality-adjusted life years showed greater cost-effectiveness in favor of manual physical therapy (difference, 0.135; 95% confidence interval: 0.134, 0.136). Manual therapy was significantly less costly than surgery (mean difference in cost per patient, €2576; P<.001). Patients in the surgical group received a greater number of other treatments and made more visits to medical doctors than those receiving manual physical therapy (P = .02). Absenteeism from paid work was significantly higher in the surgery group (P<.001). The major contributors to societal costs were the treatment protocol (surgery versus manual therapy mean difference, €106 980) and absenteeism from paid work (surgery versus manual physical therapy mean difference, €42 224). Conclusion: Manual physical therapy, including desensitization maneuvers of the central nervous system, has been found to be equally effective but less costly (ie, more cost-effective) than surgery for women with CTS. From a cost-benefit perspective, the proposed CTS manual physical therapy intervention can be considered. Level of evidence: Economic and decision analyses, level 1b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(2):55-63.
Ultrasound-Guided Application of Percutaneous Electrolysis as an Adjunct to Exercise and Manual Therapy for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: a Randomized Clinical Trial
(Philadelphia, PA : Churchill Livingstone, c2000, 2018) de-Miguel-Valtierra, L; Salom-Moreno, J; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C; Cleland, JA; Arias-Buría, José L
This randomized clinical trial compared the effects of adding ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneouselectrolysis into a program consisting of manual therapy and exercise on pain, shoulder-related disability, function, and pressure sensitivity in subacromial pain syndrome. Fifty patients with subacromial pain syndrome were randomized into manual therapy and exercise or percutaneous electrolysis group. All patients received the same manual therapy and exercise program, 1 session per week for 5 consecutive weeks. Patients assigned to the electrolysis group also received the application of percutaneous electrolysis at each session. The primary outcome was assessed using the Disabilitiesof the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included pain, function (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index [SPADI]) pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and Global Ratingof Change (GROC). They were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Both groups showed similar improvements in the primary outcome (DASH) at all follow-ups (P = .051). Subjects receiving manual therapy, exercise, and percutaneous electrolysis showed significantlygreater changes in shoulder pain (P < .001) and SPADI (P < .001) than did those receiving manual therapy and exercise alone at all follow-ups. Effect sizes were large (standardized mean difference >.91) for shoulder pain and function at 3 and 6 months in favor of the percutaneous electrolysis group. No between-group differences in PPT were found. The current clinical trial found that the inclusion of US-guided percutaneous electrolysis in combination with manual therapy and exercise resulted in no significant differences for related disability (DASH) compared with the application of manual therapy and exercise alone in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Nevertheless, differences were reported for some secondary outcomes such as shoulder pain and function (SPADI). Whether these effects are reliable should be addressed in future studies. Perspective: This study found that the inclusion of US-guided percutaneous electrolysis into a manual therapy and exercise program resulted in no significant differences for disability and pressure pain sensitivity compared with the application of manual therapy and exercise alone in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02569281.