Examinando por Autor "Marcos, Esperanza"
Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
- Resultados por página
- Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Actas del VII y VIII Congreso Académico Internacional en Gobierno y Gestión del Servicio de Tecnologías de la Información(Editores: Luis Sánchez, Luis Morán, Esperanza Marcos, Valeria de Castro, Javier Garzás, Maribel Sánchez Segura, 2014) Sánchez, Luis; Morán, Luis; Marcos, Esperanza; Castro, Valeria de; Garzás, Javier; Sánchez Segura, MaribelÍtem Analysing the cognitive effectiveness of the WebML visual notation(2017-02-17) Granada, David; Vara, Juan M.; Brambilla, Marco; Bollati, Verónica; Marcos, EsperanzaWebML is a domain-specific language used to design complex data-intensive Web applications at a conceptual level. As WebML was devised to support design tasks, the need to define a visual notation for the language was identified from the very beginning. Each WebML element is consequently associated with a separate graphical symbol which was mainly defined with the idea of providing simple and expressive modelling artefacts rather than by adopting a rigorous scientific approach. As a result, the graphical models defined with WebML may sometimes prevent proper communication from taking place between the various stake-holders. In fact, this is a common issue for most of the existing model-based proposals that have emerged during the last few years under the umbrella of model-driven engineering. In order to illustrate this issue and foster in using a scientific basis to design, evaluate, improve and compare visual notations, this paper analyses WebML according to a set of solid principles, based on the theoretical and empirical evidence concerning the cognitive effectiveness of visual notations. As a result, we have identified a set of possible improvements, some of which have been verified by an empirical study. Furthermore, a number of findings, experiences and lessons learnt on the assessment of visual notations are presented.Ítem Leveraging creativity in requirements elicitation within agile software development: A systematic literature review(2019-11-01) Aldave, Ainhoa; Vara, Juan M.; Granada, David; Marcos, EsperanzaAgile approaches tend to focus solely on scoping and simplicity rather than on problem solving and discovery. This hampers the development of innovative solutions. Additionally, little has been said about how to capture and represent the real user needs. To fill this gap, some authors argue in favor of the application of “Creative thinking” for requirements elicitation within agile software development. This synergy between creativeness and agility has arisen as a new means of bringing innovation and flexibility to increasingly demanding software. The aim of the present study is therefore to employ a systematic review to investigate the state-of-the-art of those approaches that leverage creativity in requirements elicitation within Agile Software Development, as well as the benefits, limitations and strength of evidence of these approaches. The review was carried out by following the guidelines proposed by Dr. Kitchenham. The search strategy identified 1451 studies, 17 of which were eventually classified as primary studies. The selected studies contained 13 different and unique proposals. These approaches provide evidence that enhanced creativity in requirements elicitation can be successfully implemented in real software projects. We specifically observed that projects related to user interface development, such as those for mobile or web applications, are good candidates for the use of these approaches. We have also found that agile methodologies such as Scrum, Extreme Programming or methodologies based on rapid modelling are preferred when introducing creativity into requirements elicitation. Despite this being a new research field, there is a mixture of techniques, tools and processes that have already been and are currently being successfully tested in industry. Finally, we have found that, although creativity is an important ingredient with which to bring about innovation, it is not always sufficient to generate new requirements because this needs to be followed by user engagement and a specific context in which proper conditions, such as flexibility, time or resources, have to be met.