Show simple item record

Can mindfulness-based interventions improve outcomes in cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic insomnia disorder in the general population? Systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorEntrambasaguas, Manuel de
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Silveira, Cintia
dc.contributor.authorBurgos-Julián, Francisco A.
dc.contributor.authorSanted, Miguel A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-02T11:32:25Z
dc.date.available2023-10-02T11:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationde Entrambasaguas, M., Díaz-Silveira, C., Burgos-Julián, F. A., & Santed, M. A. (2023). Can mindfulness-based interventions improve outcomes in cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic insomnia disorder in the general population? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2874es
dc.identifier.issn1099-0879
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10115/24629
dc.description.abstractCognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the recommended first-line therapy for adults with chronic insomnia disorder (ID), which is characterized by hyperarousal. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are protocols aimed at stress reduction based on non-judgmental attention control in the present moment. However, MBIs have been increasingly used without a clear scientific basis. The objective of this analysis was to examine if MBIs could be useful as a component of the CBT-I therapeutic system through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) searched in PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane and WoS. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was the primary outcome, while the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and a composite sleep variable (CSV) were secondary outcomes. Thirteen articles corresponding to nine studies (three pragmatic RCTs, three explanatory RCTs and three NRS) were included. The omnibus test found that MBIs had a small to medium effect size on ISI nearing signification when comparing active control groups in the pretest–posttest period [Δ = 0.44, p = 0.07], a medium, non-significant, effect size on PSQI [Δ = 0.52, p = 0.18], and a significant though small effect size on CSV [Δ = 0.05, p < 0.01]. No heterogeneity was found. The analysis could not demonstrate that MBIs, combined with CBT-I components in some studies, positively affected ID in the general adult population. This was probably due to the lack of pragmatic designs and suitable measuring instruments. Recommendations are made for designing further studies to address these issues.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherWileyes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectcognitive-behavioural therapyes
dc.subjectinsomniaes
dc.subjectmeta-analysises
dc.subjectmindfulnesses
dc.subjectsleepes
dc.subjectstresses
dc.titleCan mindfulness-based interventions improve outcomes in cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic insomnia disorder in the general population? Systematic review and meta-analysises
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cpp.2874es
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional