Afficher la notice abrégée

Environmental impact analysis of surface printing and 3D inkjet printing applications using an imine based covalent organic framework: A life cycle assessment study

dc.contributor.authorEspada, Juan J.
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Rosalía
dc.contributor.authorPeña, Alejandro de la
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Mar
dc.contributor.authorSegura, José L.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Carnerero, Esther M.
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T07:14:12Z
dc.date.available2023-10-06T07:14:12Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJuan J. Espada, Rosalía Rodríguez, Alejandro de la Peña, Mar Ramos, José L. Segura, Esther M. Sánchez-Carnerero, Environmental impact analysis of surface printing and 3D inkjet printing applications using an imine based covalent organic framework: A life cycle assessment study, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 395, 2023, 136381, ISSN 0959-6526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136381es
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10115/24712
dc.description.abstractCovalent organic frameworks (COFs) are emerging materials with structural modularity that allows their application in many fields. The aim of this work is to determine the environmental impact of using an imine based covalent organic framework (RT-COF-1) for both surface printing (Case A) and 3D inkjet printing (Case B) by applying Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. Experimental data on RT-COF-1 synthesis as well as results obtained by simulation of their precursors production, 1,3,5-tris-(4-aminophenyl) benzene (TAPB) and 1,3,5-benzenetricarbaldehyde (BTCA), are used. LCA results show that monomer synthesis is the most important contributor to environmental impacts in both case studies. On the other hand, the contribution of solvents used in Case A is also remarkable. The comparison between both case studies indicates that the environmental impacts of Case B is lower than that of Case A (reduction within 5%–65%). Finally, LCA results of Case B are compared to other materials used for 3D-printing, such as polymerizable ionic liquids (PILs). The results show that RT–COF–1 compares favourably with PILs in five of nine impact categories, being especially relevant the reductions achieved in the abiotic depletion and acidification potential (>90%), in the primary energy consumption (⁓35%) and carbon footprint (⁓50%), suggesting the potential of RT–COF–1 as 3D-printing material from an environmental perspective. This work is a first step for further research to highlight the main environmental burdens of using COF-based materials in this application.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCOFes
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturinges
dc.subjectLCAes
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturinges
dc.subjectSurface printinges
dc.subject3D-printinges
dc.subjectInkjet printinges
dc.titleEnvironmental impact analysis of surface printing and 3D inkjet printing applications using an imine based covalent organic framework: A life cycle assessment studyes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136381es
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalExcepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional