Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches

dc.contributor.authorBARACCO, BRUNO
dc.contributor.authorFUENTES, M VICTORIA
dc.contributor.authorCEBALLOS, LAURA
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-08T11:43:55Z
dc.date.available2024-01-08T11:43:55Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.citationBaracco, B., Fuentes, M.V. & Ceballos, L. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches. Clin Oral Invest 20, 991–1001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1591-4es
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10115/28247
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objective of this study was to compare the 5-year clinical performance in posterior restorations of three restorative systems including a low-shrinkage system and a methacrylate-based composite combined either with an etch-and-rinse or a self-etch adhesive. Materials and methods: Each of 25 patients received three class I (occlusal) or class II restorations performed with each one of the three restorative systems: Filtek Silorane Restorative System including a two-step self-etch adhesive, Adper Scotchbond 1 XT (two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive) + Filtek Z250, and Adper Scotchbond SE (two-step self-etch adhesive) + Filtek Z250. All materials were applied as per manufacturer’s instructions. Two blind observers evaluated the restorations at four different moments (baseline, after 1, 2, and 5 years) according to the USPHS-modified criteria. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to compare the behavior of the restorative systems, while Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were applied to analyze the intrasystem data (p < 0.05). Results: After 5 years, marginal staining around the restorations with Adper Scotchbond SE + Filtek Z250 was statistically more frequent and severe than that of the restorations performed with the other two systems. Intrasystem comparisons revealed a deterioration of the marginal adaptation after 5 years for all systems. A significant number of restorations bonded with self-etch adhesives showed marginal staining after 5 years of clinical service. A deterioration of the color appearance and an increase of the surface roughness were also detected in the restorations performed with Adper Scotchbond SE + Filtek Z250. Conclusions: A deterioration of the marginal adaptation was evidenced for all restorative systems, while marginal staining was more frequently seen only around the restorations performed with self-etch adhesives. Clinical relevance: No advantage was found of the silorane over the methacrylate-based composite when combined with an etch-and-rinse adhesive.es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherSPRINGERes
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectClinical evaluationes
dc.subjectSiloranees
dc.subjectLow-shrinkagees
dc.subjectSelf-etch adhesivees
dc.subjectEtch-and-rinse adhesivees
dc.subjectPosterior restorationses
dc.titleFive-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approacheses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-015-1591-4es
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 InternacionalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional