Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of techniques for soft tissue augmentation in the placement of immediate implants with and without provisionalization and to assess the quality of the reports in the literature. Randomized clinical trials, prospective clinical trials, and case series were included in this review. Clinical questions were formulated and organised according to the PICOS strategy. An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and ISI Web up until June 2016. Interexaminer agreement on eligibility (k = 0.842; p = 0.103) and quality (k = 0.933; p < 0.001) was high. Methodological approaches were assessed using criteria based on design related forms designed by the Dutch Cochrane Collaboration. Finally, 14 papers were identified. In two studies, the implant survival was 90%; for the rest of the studies it was 100%. All studies reported favourable aesthetic, biological, and radiographic outcomes. Surgical and biomechanical complications of this technique were not relevant. This technique effectively compensates for the expected loss of volume of the oral soft tissues and maintains high success rates with good aesthetic results over time.
Loading...

Quotes

0 citations in WOS
0 citations in

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley

Description

Keywords

Citation

Rojo, Rosa, Prados-Frutos, Juan Carlos, Manchón, Ángel, Rodríguez-Molinero, Jesús, Sammartino, Gilberto, Calvo Guirado, José Luis, Gómez-de Diego, Rafael, Soft Tissue Augmentation Techniques in Implants Placed and Provisionalized Immediately: A Systematic Review, BioMed Research International, 2016, 7374129, 12 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7374129

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Statistics

Views
4
Downloads
21

Bibliographic managers

Document viewer

Select a file to preview:
Reload