Ultrasound-guided percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus surgery for women with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized parallel-group trial

dc.contributor.authorFernández-de- las- Peñas, César
dc.contributor.authorOrtega-Santiago, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorLlave- Rincón, Ana I. de la-
dc.contributor.authorCleland, Joshua A.
dc.contributor.authorPareja, Juan A.
dc.contributor.authorSaddi- Díaz, Homid Fahandezh
dc.contributor.authorArias-Buría, José L
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T15:26:59Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T15:26:59Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjectiveThe aim of this clinical trial was to compare the outcomes of the application of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nerve stimulation (PENS) targeting the median nerve versus surgery for improving pain and function in women with CTS.MethodsIn this randomized parallel-group trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04246216), 70 women with CTS were randomly allocated to either PENS (n = 35) or surgery (n = 35) group. Hand pain intensity (mean pain and the worst pain experienced) was the primary outcome. Functional status and symptoms severity (Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, BCTQ) and self-perceived improvement (Global Rating of Change, GROC) were the secondary outcomes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after each intervention. Analysis was performed with intention to treat with mixed ANCOVAs adjusted for baseline outcomes.ResultsAnalyses showed an adjusted advantage for PENS at 1 (Δ −2.0, 95% CI −2.9 to −1.1) and 3 (Δ −1.4, 95% CI −2.3 to −0.5) months for mean pain, at 1 (Δ −2.2, 95% CI −3.3 to −1.1), 3 (Δ −1.75, 95% CI −2.9 to −0.6) and 6 (Δ −1.7, 95% CI −2.8 to −0.6) months in the worst pain intensity, and at 1 (Δ −0.95, 95% CI −1.1 to −0.8), 3 (Δ −0.55, 95% CI −0.8 to −0.3) and 6 (Δ −0.4, 95% CI −0.6 to −0.8) months in function. Both groups exhibited similar changes in symptom severity. Both groups reported similar improvement at 12 months in all outcomes. Symptoms and function improved in both groups, with PENS leading to better short-term outcomes than surgery.ConclusionThis clinical trial confirms that PENS applied with current understanding of pain mechanisms in CTS is as useful as surgery in women with CTS without denervation. The potential placebo effect of both interventions should not be ignored.SignificanceThe application of percutaneous nerve stimulation was more effective at short-term, but similar effective at mid and long-term, than surgery in women with carpal tunnel syndrome.es
dc.identifier.citationFernández-de-las-Peñas, C., Ortega-Santiago, R., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Cleland, J. A., Pareja, J. A., Fahandezh-Saddi-Díaz, H., & Arias-Buría, J. L. (2023). Ultrasound-guided percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus surgery for women with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized parallel-group trial. European Journal of Pain, 27, 860–870. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2117es
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ejp.2117es
dc.identifier.issn1532-2149
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10115/24655
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherWileyes
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleUltrasound-guided percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus surgery for women with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized parallel-group triales
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
European Journal of Pain - 2023 - Fern ndez‐de‐las‐Pe as - Ultrasound‐guided percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.pdf
Tamaño:
3.77 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.67 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: