An Integrative Clustering Approach to tDCS Individual Response Variability in Cognitive Performance: Beyond a Null Effect on Working Memory

dc.contributor.authorLuque-Casado, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Freiría, Rocio
dc.contributor.authorFogelson, Noa
dc.contributor.authorIglesias-Soler, Eliseo
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-del-Olmo, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-27T15:32:08Z
dc.date.available2024-12-27T15:32:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-28
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by a ‘Juan de la Cierva’ postdoctoral grant from the Spanish ‘Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades’ (FJCI-2016-28405) to Antonio Luque-Casado, ‘Ramón y Cajal’ national fellowship program to Noa Fogelson and a project grant funded by ‘Rey Juan Carlos’ University (REtDCS) to Miguel Fernández-del-Olmo, Noa Fogelson and Antonio Luque-Casado.
dc.description.abstractDespite the growing interest in the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the modulation of human cognitive function, there are contradictory findings regarding the cognitive benefits of this technique. Inter-individual response variability to tDCS may play a significant role. We explored the effects of anodal versus sham tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex (LPFC) on working memory performance, taking into account the inter-individual variability. Twenty-nine healthy volunteers received an 'offline' anodal tDCS (1.5 mA, 15 min) to the left prefrontal cortex (F3 electrode site) in an intra-individual, cross-over, sham-controlled experimental design. n-back and Sternberg task performance was assessed before (baseline), immediately after tDCS administration (T1) and 5 min post-T1 (T2). We applied an integrative clustering approach to characterize both the group and individual responses to tDCS, as well as identifying naturally occurring subgroups that may be present within the total sample. Anodal tDCS failed to improve working memory performance in the total sample. Cluster analysis identified a subgroup of 'responders' who significantly improved their performance after anodal (vs. sham) stimulation, although not to a greater extent than the best baseline or sham condition. The proportion of 'responders' ranged from 15% to 59% across task conditions and behavioral outputs. Our findings show a high inter-individual variability of the tDCS response, suggesting that the use of tCDS may not be an effective tool to improve working memory performance in healthy subjects. We propose that the use of clustering methods is more suitable in identifying 'responders' and for evaluating the efficacy of this technique.
dc.identifier.citationLuque-Casado A, Rodríguez-Freiría R, Fogelson N, Iglesias-Soler E, Fernández-Del-Olmo M. An Integrative Clustering Approach to tDCS Individual Response Variability in Cognitive Performance: Beyond a Null Effect on Working Memory. Neuroscience. 2020 Sep 1;443:120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.07.036. Epub 2020 Jul 28. PMID: 32730948.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.07.036
dc.identifier.issn0306-4522
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10115/48117
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectcluster analysis
dc.subjectcognition
dc.subjectinter-individual variability
dc.subjectnon-invasive brain stimulation
dc.subjecttranscranial direct current stimulation
dc.subjectworking memory.
dc.titleAn Integrative Clustering Approach to tDCS Individual Response Variability in Cognitive Performance: Beyond a Null Effect on Working Memory
dc.typeArticle

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
2020_An Integrative Clustering Approach to tDCS Individual Response Variability in Cognitive Performance- Beyond a Null Effect on Working Memory.pdf
Tamaño:
1.2 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.96 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: