Between Centrality and Theoretical Dispersion: Theoretical Frameworks in Spanish Peer-Reviewed Communication Journals. Analysis of Research Papers Published by Five Top-Ranked Journals 2011-2020
Fecha
2022-04-01
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Editor: Univ Navarra- Servicio de publicacions, Campus universitario de Pamplona. 31009. España.
Resumen
This paper describes the research published during the period 2011-2020 by five leading Spanish peer-reviewed journals of communication, aiming to identify the most common theoretical frameworks and standard theories. A statistically representative sample of the articles published during that period was systematically selected from the five journals of communication ranked as having the greatest continuity and impact according to SJR-Scopus: Profesional de la Información, Comunicar, Communication & Society, Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico and Revista Latina de Comunicación Social. A coding protocol that includes 13 variables and 74 categories was defined and applied to compare the type of theoretical frameworks and the theories in the different subject areas observed. The results show that although almost all the papers studied have a theoretical framework, fewer than half are grounded on recognizable theories.
Descripción
Línea de investigación: Metainvestigación: Análisis de contenidos cuantitativos aplicados a artículos científicos en revistas de comunicación (peer-reviewed papers)
Citación
Carrasco-Campos, Á. y Saperas, E. (2022): Between Centrality and Theoretical Dispersion: Theoretical Frameworks in Spanish Peer-Reviewed Communication Journals. Analysis of Research Papers Published by Five Top-Ranked Journals 2011-2020. Communication & Society, 35(2):155-168.
Colecciones
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional