Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches
dc.contributor.author | BARACCO, BRUNO | |
dc.contributor.author | FUENTES, M VICTORIA | |
dc.contributor.author | CEBALLOS, LAURA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-08T11:43:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-08T11:43:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-06 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the 5-year clinical performance in posterior restorations of three restorative systems including a low-shrinkage system and a methacrylate-based composite combined either with an etch-and-rinse or a self-etch adhesive. Materials and methods: Each of 25 patients received three class I (occlusal) or class II restorations performed with each one of the three restorative systems: Filtek Silorane Restorative System including a two-step self-etch adhesive, Adper Scotchbond 1 XT (two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive) + Filtek Z250, and Adper Scotchbond SE (two-step self-etch adhesive) + Filtek Z250. All materials were applied as per manufacturer’s instructions. Two blind observers evaluated the restorations at four different moments (baseline, after 1, 2, and 5 years) according to the USPHS-modified criteria. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to compare the behavior of the restorative systems, while Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were applied to analyze the intrasystem data (p < 0.05). Results: After 5 years, marginal staining around the restorations with Adper Scotchbond SE + Filtek Z250 was statistically more frequent and severe than that of the restorations performed with the other two systems. Intrasystem comparisons revealed a deterioration of the marginal adaptation after 5 years for all systems. A significant number of restorations bonded with self-etch adhesives showed marginal staining after 5 years of clinical service. A deterioration of the color appearance and an increase of the surface roughness were also detected in the restorations performed with Adper Scotchbond SE + Filtek Z250. Conclusions: A deterioration of the marginal adaptation was evidenced for all restorative systems, while marginal staining was more frequently seen only around the restorations performed with self-etch adhesives. Clinical relevance: No advantage was found of the silorane over the methacrylate-based composite when combined with an etch-and-rinse adhesive. | es |
dc.identifier.citation | Baracco, B., Fuentes, M.V. & Ceballos, L. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches. Clin Oral Invest 20, 991–1001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1591-4 | es |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00784-015-1591-4 | es |
dc.identifier.issn | 1436-3771 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10115/28247 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | es |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | es |
dc.rights | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Clinical evaluation | es |
dc.subject | Silorane | es |
dc.subject | Low-shrinkage | es |
dc.subject | Self-etch adhesive | es |
dc.subject | Etch-and-rinse adhesive | es |
dc.subject | Posterior restorations | es |
dc.title | Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches | es |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
- Nombre:
- extra2016cloi.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 2.82 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción: