Abdominal muscles’ thickness and bladder neck position in regular runners and controls: A comparative ultrasonography study

dc.contributor.authorAntón-Plaza, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorBo, Kari
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Pasutti, Catalina
dc.contributor.authorDíez-Fisher, Lucía
dc.contributor.authorMinguez-Esteban, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorVillafañe, Jorge H.
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Saiz, Sergio L.
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Morales, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-19T07:59:40Z
dc.date.available2025-05-19T07:59:40Z
dc.date.issued2025-06
dc.description.abstractAim The aim of the present study was to compare and quantify with transabdominal ultrasound the IRD, the thickness of the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), transversus abdominis (TrA), rectus anterior (RA) and the location of the bladder neck between runners and controls at rest and during response to different exercises. Methods A total of 38 women, aged 18–45 years, were recruited from a private rehabilitation center specializing in sports health, and divided into two groups: runners (n = 19) and sedentary women (n = 19). Thickness measurements, using suprapubic ultrasongraphy in B-Mode, of the EO, IO, TrA and RA muscles were taken at rest and during active contraction. Location of the bladder neck at rest and during pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction was taken with the transducer located suprapubically in M-Mode. Results There were no significant differences in EO TrA or RA muscle thickness at rest and during muscle contraction between runners and controls. For the IO muscle, significant differences were observed during ASLR, with runners showing greater muscle thickness (p = 0.032). Bladder neck displacement during a voluntary PFM contraction demonstrated statistically larger cranial movement for the runners of mean 0.76 ± 0.31 cm than mean 0.40 ± 0.26 cm for the sedentary group (p = 0.001). Conclusions regular running is associated with increased thickness of the IO during ASLR, and significantly greater cranial bladder neck displacement during PFM contraction.
dc.identifier.citationAbdominal muscles’ thickness and bladder neck position in regular runners and controls: A comparative ultrasonography study Antón-Plaza, Andrea et al. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, Volume 42, 477 - 481
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.002
dc.identifier.issn1360-8592 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1532-9283 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10115/86257
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectRunning
dc.subjectAbdominal muscles
dc.subjectPelvic floor muscles
dc.subjectBladder neck position
dc.subjectUltrasonography
dc.subjectMuscle thickness
dc.subjectFemale athletes
dc.titleAbdominal muscles’ thickness and bladder neck position in regular runners and controls: A comparative ultrasonography study
dc.typeArticle

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
PIIS1360859225000026.pdf
Tamaño:
1.61 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format