Automatic gait evoking in healthy adults through Vojta’s peripheric somatosensory stimulation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorPerlaes-López, Luis
dc.contributor.authorSanz-Esteban, ismael
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Antona, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Jose Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorsan-Martín-Gómez, Ana
dc.contributor.authorVives-Gelabert, Xisca
dc.contributor.authorCano-de-la-Cuerda, Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-21T11:25:07Z
dc.date.available2024-11-21T11:25:07Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-01
dc.description.abstractBackground To study the effects of different interventions on automatic gait processing in contrast with voluntary gait processing in healthy subjects. Methods A double-blind randomised controlled trial was designed (120 able-body persons between 18 and 65 years old entered and completed the study), with pre-intervention and post-intervention assessments using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The participants were randomly distributed into four groups. Prior to intervention, all participants performed voluntary gait on the ground (VoG) in a calibrated circuit following the 6MWT. The presence of automatic gait (AG) was explored post-intervention without a voluntary demand in the same circuit following the 6MWT. Each group received a different intervention for 30 min: Vojta stimulation, MOTOMED® at no less than 60 revolutions/ minute, treadmill walking at 3 km/h, and resting in a chair (control). The main assessment, conducted by a blinded rater, was the difference in distance covered (in meters) during the 6MWT between pre- and post-intervention. Surface electromyography (sEMG) average root mean square (RMS) signals in the right tibialis anterior, right soleus, right rectus femoris, and right biceps femoris were also considered outcome measures. Results The Vojta group was the only one that initiated AG after the intervention (476.4 m ± 57.1 in VoG versus 9.0 m ± 8.9 in AG, p < 0.001) with comparable kinematics and EMG parameters during voluntary gait, except for ankle dorsal flexion. Within the Vojta group, high variability in kinematics, sEMG activity, and distance covered was observed. Conclusions AG isolation is approachable through Vojta at only one session measurable with the 6MWT without any voluntary gait demand. No automatic gait effects were observed post-intervention in the other groups.es
dc.identifier.citationPerales-López L, Sanz-Esteban I, Jiménez-Antona C, Serrano JI, San-Martín-Gómez A, Vives-Gelabert X, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R. Automatic gait evoking in healthy adults through Vojta's peripheric somatosensory stimulation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Oct 1;21(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01470-2. PMID: 39354570; PMCID: PMC11443748.es
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12984-024-01470-2es
dc.identifier.issn1743-0003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10115/41893
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitationes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.subjectAutomatic gaites
dc.subjectKinematicses
dc.subjectVojta therapyes
dc.subjectReflex locomotiones
dc.titleAutomatic gait evoking in healthy adults through Vojta’s peripheric somatosensory stimulation: a double-blind randomized controlled triales
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Automatic gait evoking in healthy adults.pdf
Tamaño:
1.94 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
artículo

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.67 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: